The Ghost Network Behind Pediatric Home Nursing: When Authorized Hours Go Unfilled

Episode Summary

A pediatric patient in a New Jersey hospital is medically ready for discharge — equipment arranged, family ready, nursing hours authorized by the health plan. The only missing piece: an actual nurse. This episode uses that scenario to examine the structural gap between authorized private duty nursing (PDN) hours and filled hours in Medicaid managed care, why standard provider directories overstate real pediatric home health capacity, and what CMS's 2024 Medicaid managed care access rule signals for how plans will need to prove — not just claim — network adequacy going forward.

"When the network looks broad on paper, but families still cannot get care, the question is not, do we have enough providers listed? The question is, can a child actually get home?"

Chapters

  1. The Discharge That Doesn't Happen — A clinically ready child, an authorized care plan, and no nurse to staff it.
  2. The Directory Problem — Why a state can show hundreds of home health agencies while only a handful actually serve pediatric high-acuity cases.
  3. Authorized vs. Filled Hours — The distinction that matters most for families, and the 20–40% unfulfilled-hours range documented by MACPAC.
  4. What Makes a Network a "Ghost Network" — Six reasons a directory listing doesn't equal real access.
  5. Why Pediatric Home Health Is a Different Labor Market — Ventilators, trachs, feeding tubes, and why acuity narrows the real provider pool.
  6. The CMS Rule — Secret shopper surveys, wait-time standards, and the shift from "is the directory complete" to "can members get care."
  7. The Pediatric PDN Access Audit — A 7-step framework for MCOs to move beyond static network adequacy reporting.
  8. What Providers and Advocates Should Document — Turning anecdote into evidence health plans and regulators can act on.

Companies mentioned in this episode:

Sources cited in this episode:

Key Data Points Referenced

  • MACPAC has documented that a meaningful share of authorized private duty nursing hours nationally go unfulfilled — often cited in the 20%–40% range.
  • CMS's 2024 Medicaid Managed Care Access, Finance, and Quality final rule introduces secret shopper survey requirements, moving oversight from directory completeness toward actual service access.
Transcript
Alex Yarijanian:

There's a child in a New Jersey hospital who is clinically ready to go home. Patient is ready to be discharged. Not almost ready, not maybe next week. They are ready.

The discharge plan is written, the equipment can be arranged, the family wants them home, the care team wants them home. And the health plan has authorized private duty nursing hours. But there is one missing piece. No nurse. So the child stays.

Not because the hospital is the right place anymore, not because the family failed to plan, not because the doctor forgot the order. The child stays because the home nursing network on paper doesn't match the home nursing network in real life.

If you want to understand what is broken in Medicaid managed care access, don't start with a dashboard. Start with that discharge planner trying to find a pediatric home health agency that can actually staff the case.

Because on paper, New Jersey has hundreds of home health agencies.

But when we reviewed the NPI registry for pediatric specific home health designations, the number of dedicated pediatric home health agencies looked closer to eight out of 200.

The agencies that surfaced as pediatric specific included names like Affirmed Home Care, Pediatrics and Adolescent Therapy Associates, Active Pediatrics Therapy Services, Growing Hope, Pediatric Care for Kid Care, and Family Care Agency. This is not a published government statistics.

It's what we've done at carenodes at my company to actually enumerate the network scope as it relates to pediatric home health. When the network looked so broad on paper, it became a little bit of a head scratcher because it started to point to a much bigger problem.

When the network looks broad on paper but families still cannot get care, the question is not do we have enough providers listed? The question is, can a child actually get home? I'm Alex Arajanian and this is the Value Based Care Advisory Podcast.

Today's episode is about pediatric home health, private duty, and one of the most important access problems in Medicaid managed care. That's the gap between authorized care and delivered care. Because in Medicaid, authorization is not the finish line. Right?

A health plan can approve private duty nursing hours. A hospital can discharge a child. A family can be ready. But ifta, if those hours go unfilled, access has failed.

And this is where the story gets uncomfortable for managed care organizations, regulators and provider networks nationally. The MACPAC has documented that a meaningful share of authorized private duty nurses go unfulfilled. Okay, why is that?

A meaningful share of authorized private duty nursing hours go unfulfilled. Often cited in the 20% to 40% range, this isn't a New Jersey specific figure, but it captures the scale of the access failure.

If a medically complex child is approved for 80 hours of nursing a week and 20 to 40% of those hours are not staffed, that family is not receiving the benefit that we're authorized to receive. They are receiving a promise with missing labor behind it.

So managed care has a habit of treating provider directories as if they are proof of access. A directory says there are providers. A network adequacy filing says the plan meets the standard. A contract says the service is covered.

But pediatric private duty nursing exposes the weakness in that logic. A provider directory can include agencies that 1. Do not take new pediatric cases. 2. Do not serve the child's county. 3.

Do not have high acuity cases to be staffed. I'm going to stop enumerating them because they're on and on. They do not have overnight nurses do not accept the plans.

The reimbursement rate are listed but are unreachable are technically contracted but functionally unavailable. This is how you get what's called a ghost network. The term ghost network gets used a lot in behavioral health, but the same concept applies here.

The plan appears to have a network. The directory appears to show access. But when a family or discharge planner tries to use it, the network just disappears.

Research on Medicaid managed care directories has found very high rates of inaccuracy or inaccessible listings.

S cited similar evidence in a:

That's a very different standard now. Why pediatric home health? Why is pediatric home health different? Pediatric home health is not just adult home care with smaller patients.

These cases can involve ventilators, treks, feeding tubes, seizure disorders, complex medication regimes, and fragile transitions from NICU to PICU to home. The family may need nursing coverage overnight. They may need nurses who are comfortable with pediatric acuity.

They may need backup staffing when a nurse calls out. That makes the labor market much narrower than the directory suggests. A general home health agency may exist in the state.

It may be enrolled in Medicaid, but that doesn't mean it could staff a medically complex pediatric case tomorrow. This is why the NPI registry analysis matters. If you search broadly for home health agencies, the market looks large.

If you narrow to pediatric specific designations and actual pediatric orientation, the market looks much smaller. That smaller market is a real market that families experience, right? That's the actual patient experience, the small network.

So what is this unauthorized but unfulfilled problem? The most important distinction in this episode is the difference between authorized hours and filled hours.

Authorized hours are what the plan says the child can receive. Filled hours are what actually show up in the home for families. The second number is the one that matters.

If a child is authorized for 12 hours of nursing per day but the agency can only staff six, then that's the rest the family absorbs, right? That's the rest of the impact.

Parents become the backstop, siblings feel the strain, hospital discharge gets delayed, emergency department use becomes more likely, caregivers burn out. And from a managed care perspective, the system may look compliant because the service was technically approved. That is the policy failure.

Approving a service is not the same as delivering access. And we all know this. It is not the same. It's not one and the same. This is where the story comes back to the hospital.

New Jersey Children's Hospital and New Jersey Hospital association policy discussions have raised the issue of children waiting for weeks, sometimes longer, for discharge to home nursing. This should be framed very carefully. But anyone who's worked on complex pediatric discharge knows the scenario is real.

A child no longer needs inpatient care but cannot go home safely without nursing. The hospital bed stays occupied. The family waits. The health plan has authorized the benefits, but the home based workforce is just not there.

problem. Now I know we're in:

CMS:

One of the most important ideas is that access cannot be measured only through static provider directories or contractual.

CMS is moving towards secret shopper surveys, appointment wait time standards and more practical tests of whether members can actually obtain services for pediatric private duty nursing. That logic could go even further. The key access question should be how many authorized PD private duty nursing hours were actually filled?

How many children experienced delayed discharge because home nursing was unavailable? How many agencies listed in the directory are actually accepting new pediatric cases? How many can staff high acuity pediatric cases?

How many can actually partially versus fully be staffed? Those numbers matter. Not just the network count, not the directory size, not just the provider is contracted. Yes, check mark. But it matters.

What should health plans do differently? When I advise a Medicaid MCO on this problem, I don't start with a generic network adequacy report. I start with a pediatric PD and access audit.

First, compare authorized hours to filled hours. Second, identify children waiting in the hospital for nursing.

Third, validate every pediatric home health agency and directory through live outreach, which is what we did. Fourth, separate agencies that serve adults only, mixed populations and true pediatric high acuity cases.

Fifth, map capacity by county, shift type and acuity. Sixth, identify rate or contracting barriers that make agencies unwilling to take cases.

And finally, seventh, treat unfulfilled authorized hours as an access failure, not just a provider staffing issue.

Because if the plan authorizes the care but the family cannot get that care, the member experience is still a failure and the bad outcomes still stick with the plan. So what should providers document for pediatric home health agencies, hospitals and advocates? Documentation strategy matters.

Don't just say access is bad. That's not sufficient.

Document the referral date, authorization date, requested hours, filled hours, miss shifts, agencies contracted reason for refusal, county discharge day delays, family impact.

This is how your anecdotal experience becomes actual evidence that regulators, health plans and policymakers can act on and that you can leverage in your contracting discussions with the health plans. So the story we started with was this child ready to leave the hospital but waiting for a nurse.

It's not just a sad itch case, it's a stress test for Medicaid managed care. If the network is real, the child gets home. If the network is paper only, the child waits. That is the difference between coverage and access.

And in pediatric private duty nursing, the difference is measured in hospital days, family exhaustion, and children who should be home but are not. So the next time someone says the plan the health plan has hundreds of home health agencies in the network.

Ask the better question, how many can take those pediatric cases today? That is the network that matters. And I'm Alex Yarijanian. This is the Value Based Care Advisory podcast.

If this episode was useful, share it with someone working on Medicaid access, discharge planning, or managed care network adequacy.

And if you want help turning provider director data into an actual access analysis, this is exactly the kind of work you can do following the guidance I just gave. Thank you.

All Episodes Previous Episode
Show artwork for Value Based Care Advisory (VBCA) Podcast

About the Podcast

Value Based Care Advisory (VBCA) Podcast
Demystifying healthcare transformation: Actionable insights and expert strategies for advancing value-based care and improving outcomes for all
The VBCA Podcast is a solution-focused platform dedicated to advancing the transformation of healthcare through value-based care (VBC) models. Our mission is to break down complex healthcare topics into accessible, actionable insights for leaders, entrepreneurs, engaged consumers, and anyone passionate about meaningful change in healthcare. By challenging the healthcare industrial complex, we provide tools, strategies, and expert perspectives that empower our listeners to navigate and accelerate the shift toward better outcomes, lower costs, and improved patient experiences.

Each episode delivers thought-provoking discussions and practical advice from industry experts, spotlighting innovative approaches to healthcare reform and highlighting voices that are often overlooked in traditional dialogues. Whether you're a healthcare executive, provider, payer, policy influencer, entrepreneur, or informed patient, we aim to inspire new ideas and support you in driving transformation in the healthcare space.

Powered by Carenodes.

About your host

Profile picture for Alex Yarijanian

Alex Yarijanian

Alex Yarijanian is a visionary healthcare executive with over 15 years of experience in healthcare strategy, payer-provider relations, and value-based care models. As CEO and Founder of Carenodes, Alex has led efforts to integrate nonmedical services into healthcare, promoting a biopsychosocial model that focuses on holistic patient well-being. This initiative has reached 51 million Americans, supported by $1.5 billion in funding for innovative healthcare technologies.

In his role as Enterprise Leader for Value-Based Care and Payer Contracting at Mahmee, Alex spearheaded national expansion and contracting initiatives, negotiating partnerships with major payers across 43 states, saving $58 million for a Medicaid plan by reducing C-section rates.

His strategic insights have also driven significant operational efficiencies at Neuroglee Therapeutics, where as Senior VP, he enhanced Alzheimer’s and cognitive care services through digital therapeutics, expanding payer networks by 95%.

Alex’s career is marked by a commitment to healthcare as a right, advocating for patient-centered, equitable healthcare systems. His educational background includes a Master’s in Healthcare Administration from California State University, Long Beach, and a Bachelor’s in Psychology from the University of California, Riverside.